CAMPAIGN-1: Community Health, Safety and Prevention or Mitigation Ideas

JIHADIST ANYTHING GOES RULES OF ENGAGEMENT AGAINST THE INFIDEL

Origination: 2016-08-06T7:00 UTC

Last Updated: 2017-05-23T6:00 UTC

-

PURPOSE:

This post serves mainly as a reference that I will use to link to several other comments within associated separate user posted topics/content. Herein, I open a brief dialogue regarding root causes and justifications underpinning the JIHADI "ANYTHING GOES" RULES OF ENGAGEMENT AGAINST "THE INFIDEL," and specifically, Muslim religious and legal contemplations of THE USE OF WMD'S, including Nukes, Biological and Chemical weapons against the Infidel. Essentially, this post is useful for (partially) understand Islamic jihad rules of engagement, which essentially rely upon several portions of text from the Koran, Hadith, and elsewhere to justify and mandate Genocide of the Infidel by any type of method (as needed or desired).

-

RELEASE TIMING (RECENT TERRORIST INCIDENT):

The Ariana Grande concert terrorist attack against youths on 05-22-2017 in Manchester England, whereby 22 people were killed by a suicide bomber (mainly children under the age of 16), as well as multiple others injured from shrapnel. We must now ask ourselves if anything is off limits, or have terrorists finally reached the most despicable and pathological level possible and are now targeting and murdering our children as part of the global Caliphate.

-

DISCLAIMER:

This topic does not imply actions to take towards Muslims, but rather, it discusses actions they are obligated to take towards infidels (via Sharia Law). Information and interpretations below, are not my own, but rather are a small collection of relevant versus and Islamic Law interpretations (of “scholars of various Islamic legal schools” created by their own authorities) which have been compiled herein, for the purpose of exploring this topic. This topic does not imply any specific sweeping judgements or actions towards any groups, as (all Bad actors engage in their own Bad actions through their own individualized decision making processes may or may not partake in jihad or support for terrorism), many will choose to take no action and live peaceful and prosperous lives.

-

KEY DOCUMENT:

Osama Bin Laden asked for a Fatwa (religious edict) to conduct his terrorist campaigns and use WMD's, and received the following document "A treatise on the legal status of using WMD's against infidels" from/by Nasir Bin Hamd Al Fahd (Saudi Arabian Salafist Islamic scholar who supports jihad).

=>SOURCE: Fatwa by Saudi Sheikh Nasir bin Hamd al-Fahd, “A Treatise on the Legal Status of Using Weapons of Mass Destruction Against Infidels,” May 2003. https://web.archive.org/web/20090809180630/http://www.carnegieendowment.org/static/npp/fatwa.pdf

-

BACKGROUND:

To explore this serious issue (the Religious doctrine that calls for destruction of non-believers, and the “anything goes” rules of engagement), I call to attention official religious text in English, and an Islamic Treatise which contains ISLAMIC DOCTRINE FACTS that we should all consider during the evaluating of the condition of Islamic terrorism and their Jihad and caliphate aspirations. I caution the Islamic authority of all of the documents presented below may be called to question by some, if it is an interpretation, but in general they are accepted as fact or permissible as Sharia law by most).

-

THE DOCUMENT OF INTEREST: A TREATISE ON THE LEGAL STATUS OF USING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AGAINST INFIDELS, BY NASIR BIN HAMD AL-FAHD. In May 2003 (during the peak war on terror activities) Islamic legal scholars issued a "Fatwa" (legal conclusion) that it is acceptable to use WMD’s, Nuke, and use Biological and Chemical weapons against “the Infidel." Essentially, this document (linked to this topic and discussed below) contains information intended by Muslims to justify actions taken by jihadists, (including multiple retrofitted justifications of why it is acceptable to kill the infidel, women and children by almost any means). In other words, having read the text, it is clear that jihadists and supporters aspire to "Nuke the Infidel" and do anything they can to eradicate enemies preventing the spread of Islam, and therefore, (they've searched for and found weak arguments from Islamic Law and elsewhere to prop up their desire for a Global Islam State/Caliphate). As stated above, the name of the document (fatwa.pdf) is “A TREATISE ON THE LEGAL STATUS OF USING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AGAINST INFIDELS, BY NASIR BIN HAMD AL-FAHD” (I attached a copy to this topic, it is a must read for those who need to understand this particular jihadist justification for use of WMD’s against the U.S. and others).

-

----------- BARRIERS AGAINST COOPERATION OF ISLAMISTS WITH INFIDELS ----------

-

INTERNATIONAL LEGAL CONFLICT: This treatise that I linked to this topic (and as I’ve seen in many other cases), immediately states that INFIDEL LAWS MEAN NOTHING TO THEM. Specifically they point out that the terms "internationally banned weapons," "forbidden by international law," Charter of Human Rights," "Geneva Convention" are disregarded by them and (as stated in the Fatwa.PDF): "All these terms have no standing in Islamic law."

SEE PAGE-7 of the treatise (regarding KORAN 64:16 “Fear God as far as able,” and its interpretation in Sharh Sahih Muslim 9:102, within the linked Fatwa document which further exemplifies (the application of this verse) - Page 7 contains 3 critically interpretations as follows:

=>"There is no prohibited thing when there is necessity."

=>“There is no obligation when there is inability."

=>Also, essentially, Muslims can use other Muslims in obscene ways while fighting the Infidel.

INTERPRETATION: An objective observer, having read these 3 verses from Page 7 of this fatwa.pdf document, will likely come to realize that these ARE BLANKET STATEMENTS THAT ENABLE “ANYTHING GOES” (RULES OF ENGAGEMENT AGAINST THE INFIDEL). The Islamic scholars have deduced that during Jihad, they should kill the infidel in a good manor, but if they cannot (for any reason), then they can use bombing, burning, destroying, and flooding (are all permissible), and women and children can be killed as collateral damage, and it is permitted to use any means that has been used against them as well, or that will provide the advantage necessary for them to win.

-

ISLAMIC LEGAL ANTI-DEFEATISM, (YOU CAN NOT WIN OVER ISLAMISTS WITH LOVE OR MONEY) the treatise document we are examining, further states that all dialogue/language within Islamic Law texts “must be free of”:

=>Muslims must “make no attempt to gain the affections of the infidels”

=>Muslims must not “harmonize the religious law of Islam with what they pretend to call the rights of man”

=>Muslims must not refer to infidels as “peace loving peoples.”

-

EXISTENTIAL THREAT: There are many conflicts here, whereby a religion exists that seeks to kill non-believers by smiting them at the neck, and is incompatible with my life (seeks to kill me as being labeled an infidel).

-

CONSTITUTIONAL CONFLICT: The U.S. constitution respects all religions, and yet the constitution is also in conflict with itself, as it says all people have certain unalienable rights in the Bill of Rights (yet allows for a religion that seeks to snuff out those rights if it has the chance to).

-

SHARIA LAW: Sharia Law is vastly different from U.S. law as well, and they have stated that the laws of the infidel do not apply to them, yet live in countries among the infidel. See key elements of Sharia laws that govern all Muslims (particularly the Koran/Quran and the Hadith subsections given below in “Key dialogue Setting Fourth Islamic Jihad Engagement.”

-

------- EXAMPLE KEY DIALOGUE SETTING FORTH ISLAMIC JIHAD ENGAGEMENT -------

-

KORAN AKA QURAN: (Mohammad Habib Shakir English Translation)

KORAN 2:194 (Islamic revenge obligation) “Whoso commits against you, do you must commit aggression against him like as he has committed against you.” Essentially, continuous justification for revenge has been implied ever since (the First Crusade in a 1095 by Pope Urban II, military support for the Byzantine Empire, who needed reinforcements for his conflict with westward migrating Turks in Anatolia, was said to have culminated in a “night attack”).

-

KORAN 8:12 (how to kill infidels, Smite them at the neck) And He has said "make firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.

-

KORAN 9:5 (CONFINING AND KILLING INFIDELS) - “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them” …precedence – The prophet Muhammad confined the people of al-Ta’if, and bombarded them with a catapult.

=>TUHFAT AL-MUHTAJ 9:242 legal interpretation (CAPTURE AND/OR KILL INFIDELS ANYWHERE THEY RESIDE) “One may besiege infidels in towns, CITADELS, and elsewhere,” and by any means, and in anyone’s presence (including children).

-

KORAN 16:126 (vengeance magnitude) “And if you take your turn, then retaliate with the like of that with which you were afflicted” (also enables them to use WMD's against America).

-

KORAN 42:40 (enables and obligates revenge) and God says “and the recompense of evil is evil the like of it...surely He does not love the unjust” (Further used to justify actions to be taken towards America, related to actions taken while fighting “the war on terror,”)

-

KORAN 47:4 (specific mandate to kill infidels) God has said, when referring to unbelievers of Islam, “So when you meet those who disbelieve, then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then make (them) prisoners.”

-

KORAN 59:5 (Muslims can destroy property and kill women and children to repel infidels, "Whatever Palm trees you cut down..." also KORAN 59:2 relates to (expelling the infidel) Allah “He it is Who caused those who disbelieved of the followers of the Book to go forth from their homes at the first banishment” their justification for banishment is the potential corruption of Islam caused by infidels living among them. Not entering the rule of Islam, is greater than the corruption of destroying property or killing women and children of the infidels, whom may someday “threaten Muslim lands, religion, honor., lives, property.” (Opinion: this justification among others seems critically misinterpreted)

-

KORAN 64:16 (mandate to do as the Koran directs)

“Therefore be careful of (your duty to) Allah as much as you can,...” is used to further enforce the above stated mandates, (further obligated under Sharia Law).

=> (if able/unable) is interpreted in Sharh Sahih Muslim 9:102 as IF UNABLE to smite the neck, then use any other approach (this verse justifies an “anything goes” approach to engaging the infidel, see further implications below)

-

HADITH OR OTHER LEGITIMATE SOURCE:

AHKAM AL-QUR’AN 4:176, (CREATE AN ISLAMIC STATE by removing non-believers via property destruction) the Prophet Mohammad “cut down and burned the date-palms of the Banu al-Nadir” to force them to leave the lands. Destroying the enemy's property so as to damage and weaken and induce them to depart Muslim lands and for the sake of the Islamic State is permitted by Islamic law.

-

SHARH KHALIL 3:113, (CONVERT TO ISLAM OR BE KILLED) “One may fight the enemy with all means of warfare if they do not accept the summons to Islam.”

-

AL-RISALAH P299, (INFIDEL WOMEN AND CHILDREN CAN BE KILLED), once again, Islamic scholars refer to the prophet Muhammad stating “they are of them,” and further state in this text that infidels “They do not have the legal factor of faith, which spares one’s blood, nor do they live in an abode of faith, (e.g. an Islamic temple), which prevents an attack on the abode.”

-

AL-SAYL AL-JARRAR 4:534 (KILL INFIDELS ANY WAY YOU WANT) “God has commanded that polytheists should be killed” (but didn’t obligate Muslims to kill infidels in a special way all of the time) “Therefore there is nothing to prevent their killing by every cause of death: shooting, piercing, drowning, razing, casting from a cliff and so forth.”

-

AL-SUNAN AL-KUBRA 9:78, as well as Sahih Muslim, Ibn Umar, (justification to attack innocent people while they are off guard, women and children may die as collateral damage) “The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, attacked the Banu Al-Mustaliq while they were off guard among their cattle. He killed the fighters and took their children captive!

=>Others were injured or killed in night raids during the time of their Prophet and justified as collateral damage, because the Prophet Muhammad said “they are of them.”

=>INFIDEL GENOCIDE: Conclusions drawn from al-Sa’b, “if those engaged in jihad establish that the evil of the infidels can only be repelled by attacking them at night with weapons of mass destruction, then they may be used even if they ANNIHILATE ALL INFIDELS.

-

TUHFAT-AL-MUHTAJ 9:242 (Muslims can be killed without concern during mass-destruction jihad activities), essentially, Islamic legal schools have ruled that this is a necessity, because all lands now contain Muslims, and this ruling is so that “the enemy cannot force us to abandon jihad by imprisoning a Muslim among them.”

-

Umdat-Al-Qari 14:270, “Muslims may employ any strategem that will sap their polytheist enemy’s strength, weaken their cunning, and facilitate victory over them.” The treatise document examined in this topic discussed examples “setting fires, flooding them, poisoning their water, and devastating and destroying their habitations.”

=>(PRECEDENCE FOR MASS DESTRUCTION OF INFIDELS) Muslim justification and strategy examples:

……Jihad al-talab (jihad of pursuit) the precedence of mass destruction is established as “destroying Infidel lands and bombardment with fire, as seen in the Byzantine war,” via ships and catapults that did not discriminate between infidel women, children, animals and land being destroyed.

……Jihad al-daf’ (jihad of repulsion), the documents given below state that scholars agree that mass destruction may be justified “imperative and obligatory” to remove infidels from their lands.

-

SHARH AL-SIYAR AL-KABIR 4:1467 (BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS JUSTIFICATIONS) Muhammad to subdue the infidel and break their strength, He said that there was nothing wrong with the Muslims “Burning the Polytheists strongholds, flooding them with water, setting up catapults against them, cutting off their water, or PUTTING BLOOD DUNG OR POISON IN THEIR WATER TO BEFOUL IT FOR THEM.” Further, the treatise document examined in this topic stated that the Byzantine bombardment was also said to contain “snakes and scorpions” which is their justification for their precedence to use Biological weapons on the Infidels (opinion: sounds like retrofitted confabulations to me).

-

-------------------------------------------------CONCESSION-----------------------------------------------------

Having read all of this, there is one very important point to keep in mind, and that is, that Radicals or Extremist Muslims in many cases take information from the Koran out of context, and the chief problem is that they pull one small verse out of the Koran and represent it as standalone information, when in fact, the preceding verses might state under what criteria a given action is acceptable. Therefore, any verse from the Koran must be interpreted in the context of all the verses relative to the section, and converted to contemporary meaning and relevance.

-

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-

IMPRESSIONS:

If you don’t believe any of this, read the Islamic documents (in English) and/or passages from the associated text for yourself. In all of my readings, I have observed (with no judgements) that many Muslims feel entitled to do ANYTHING the Koran says, anything a Hadith says the Prophet Mohammad said or did (both used to develop Islamic jurisprudence), and anything his companions did (with permission from the Prophet Mohammad) which may set a precedence (as a justification for an action), as well as some interpretations of allusions meant to call something to mind but not be taken literally. Hope exists for peace with Muslims who choose to practice the non-violent aspects of the Koran, while simultaneously choosing to interpret anything that projects ambiguity peacefully (if they choose to error on the side of peace), and anything that projects hostility could be nullified (if they interpret the passage as something God would not want, or as something that they cannot do in good conscience or the action is simply not applicable to modern society). I find that many (but not all) of the adverse interpretations from the Koran will be neutralized if the Koran is interpreted in the context of all the verses relative to the section, and converted to contemporary meaning and relevance. Interpretation, attitude, behavior and action will surely depend upon the orthodoxy at the individual level as well, and is not predictable nor applicable at the nation-state level, (with certain caveats, not otherwise specified). There is some ambiguity in Sharia Law as well that may modify practices among the different schools of thought. There are 5 schools of thoughts in Islam, four major schools of Sunni sharia law (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i and Hanbali), and one major Shia sharia law (Jafari). The sharia (law) between these schools is the same for topics covered in the Quran, but in matters not covered explicitly in the Quran, they sometimes differ from each other, and there enters further ambiguity and conflict which must be settled among themselves, but creates wiggle room for peace. I wish to note here that I despise the word infidel, it is particularly abhorrent to me because I am not a Muslim, and yet I have prayed to God almost every single day something good and nothing bad from the time I could speak (up until today), with numerous good deeds, and governed my actions lawfully, etc. (so how can I be placed in the unfaithful/infidel “targeted for death” category by people who have never met me, and as prescribed by a text written more than a millennium before I was born and before America was discovered? This occurs because several Islamic edicts boil the world down to "you are either a Muslim and will live (or are protected for some reason), or a non-Muslim that will convert or die," and that is the official religious and legal view of the world as per Sharia Law, Koran, and Hadith). The section labeled EXAMPLE KEY DIALOGUE SETTING FOURTH ISLAMIC JIHAD ENGAGEMENT, exemplifies that Muslims are commanded by Religion and obligated under Islamic Law to subdue all infidels, and that a continuous mandate to kill infidels is perpetuated infinitely by the associated followers and actors who choose to become jihadists at any point in the future, (and killing or destruction of anyone may be undertaken by any means they choose regardless of the “infidels international laws,” or the obscenity of the action). The above text is shocking, because no other religion demonstrates numerous, continuous, obsessive and systematic (interpretations, religious, and legal mandates to expel, exterminate, convert and kill infidels – in this case non-Muslims). Conquest and expansion of Islam, including creating a pure Islamic State by destroying your neighbor’s property to get rid of infidels (because they are not the same religion) seems extraordinary hostile even for ancient societies, leading us to ponder (how can this still be going on in modern times? Yet it is.). Any attempt to reform Islam to be more tolerant of e.g. non-believers is known as "apostasy" and is punishable by death. As a separate issue, there is obviously certain Islamic groups that have fixated their hatred towards Israel and America (projecting all of their problems on to them), which is a segue for terrorism, necessitated the “War on Terrorism” and enters us into the WMD discussion above (of the treatise document) which justifies killing infidels, Israel and America with WMD’s, and/or in mass quantity by any means possible. The area of major concern is that many individuals will act upon the interpretation of the Koran, and Koran 16:126, 2:194, 42:40, among other Islamic documents are found to support, obligate and Justify use of WMD's against America, and further expands the use through their interpretations, including (as America has "done evil to Muslim lands" and "the recompense of evil is evil the like of it"). Further, our peaceful options have been seemingly blocked because Islamic Legal scholars have invented “ANTI-DEFEATISM” rules whereby Muslims are not to befriend infidels, and cannot be won over with money or trade options (this implies recent U.S. attempts were doomed to fail, not otherwise specified herein). Unfortunately, upon undertaking evaluation of the above documents, I can report nothing good, and am disturbed that intolerance and destruction has been incorporated into text that is mandated by certain authorities to be “Gods will on Earth,” but fails to account for the fact that God created all of us, nor account for the omnipotence of God whom created a vast Universe containing over 500 Billion known Galaxies, and thus the preoccupation with killing infidels prettifies God power and interests, in that I assume (God is not preoccupied with destruction of the rest of the humans that God made), but rather, I assume it more probable that God could destroy “the infidel” if God wanted to (but hasn’t) and does not need any microscopic humans to do it on Gods behalf. To end this short topic succinctly, I leave with the conclusion that based on the above Islamic religious dialogue and legal text, we can expect never ending attempts to kill the infidels and to expand Islam across the entire globe, (as per religious obligation and legal mandate), and by any and all means including Nukes, so long as ignorance, intolerance, and sociological developments remain stagnant.

-

ADDITIONAL REFERENCE INFORMATION:

QURAN: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quran

HADITH: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadith

 

GET THE FORMATTED BOOK “JIHADIST ANYTHING GOES RULES OF ENGAGEMENT AGAINST THE INFIDEL” HERE:

https://payhip.com/b/MoFS

Tags

Voting

2 votes
Active
Idea No. 110